Newgate Solicitors in Barnet, London, has no affiliation with Newgate Legal in Mallorca
September 4, 2025 in Criminal Law & Sentencing

Justice Secretary Sentencing Powers, What the New Reforms Mean for Sentencing

Justice Secretary Sentencing Powers - illustration showing veto authority over sentencing guidance in England and Wales.

The UK government has announced sweeping changes that give the Justice Secretary sentencing powers to veto new guidelines from the Sentencing Council. These reforms, introduced under the Sentencing Bill, represent one of the most significant shifts in sentencing oversight in recent decades.

While ministers argue the move strengthens democratic accountability, critics question whether it undermines the independence of the judiciary and risks politicising sentencing. For individuals facing criminal charges, understanding these reforms is essential. This guide explores what the changes mean, why they were introduced, and how they could impact future cases.

Background to the Sentencing Council

The Sentencing Council is an independent public body established in 2010. Its primary role is to produce sentencing guidelines for courts in England and Wales. These guidelines are not legally binding but are followed by judges and magistrates in most cases to ensure consistency across the justice system.

Before these reforms, the Council operated with relative independence, consulting stakeholders such as judges, lawyers, academics and the public before issuing new guidance. Courts relied heavily on these guidelines when deciding appropriate punishments, balancing factors such as harm caused, culpability and mitigating circumstances.

What Has Changed Under the Sentencing Bill?

The Sentencing Bill introduces new oversight mechanisms. For the first time, the Justice Secretary and the Lady Chief Justice must both approve any new guidance before it can be issued.

Key changes include:

  • Dual approval requirement: Both the Justice Secretary and Lady Chief Justice must sign off new guidelines.
  • Veto powers: If either refuses, the guidance will not be published.
  • Business plan oversight: The Sentencing Council must obtain Justice Secretary approval for its annual work plan.

These changes significantly alter the balance of power between government, judiciary and the Sentencing Council.

Why the Reforms Were Introduced

The reforms stem from a dispute earlier in 2025 between the Sentencing Council and the government.

The Council proposed guidelines requiring pre-sentence reports for offenders from certain groups, including ethnic minorities, women and young adults aged 18-25. The goal was to ensure judges had more background information before imposing sentences, reducing disparities.

However, ministers and opposition parties criticised the proposal. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood described it as “differential treatment” while others labelled it “two-tier justice.” Under pressure, the government passed emergency legislation blocking the guidance.

This conflict prompted wider reforms, leading to the Justice Secretary’s new sentencing powers.

Supporters Perspective

Supporters argue the reforms restore democratic accountability. Sentencing policy, they say, should reflect the will of Parliament, not unelected bodies.

Justice Secretary Mahmood stated:

“Policy must be set by parliamentarians, who answer to the people.”

Supporters also argue the veto ensures that sentencing guidance aligns with broader government priorities, such as tackling prison overcrowding and addressing public concerns about crime.

Critics Perspective

Critics fear the reforms undermine judicial independence. The Sentencing Council was created precisely to depoliticise sentencing, ensuring decisions were based on evidence rather than political agendas.

By giving ministers veto powers, critics worry sentencing could become a tool for short-term political gain. For example, guidelines may be blocked if they appear “soft” on crime, regardless of their effectiveness in reducing reoffending.

Legal commentators warn this risks eroding public confidence in the impartiality of the justice system.

The Minority Groups Controversy

The debate over minority offender treatment lies at the heart of the reforms.

  • Council’s position: Additional reports would help judges understand cultural or social factors, ensuring fairer outcomes.
  • Government’s position: The approach risked bias “against straight white men” (as phrased by critics) and undermined equal treatment.

Official figures show offenders from ethnic minorities consistently receive longer sentences for indictable offences than white offenders. The Council believed its proposals would mitigate this. Instead, ministers intervened to block the rules, leading to this broader overhaul.

Wider Sentencing Reforms

The Sentencing Bill is not just about sentencing powers, it forms part of a broader strategy to tackle challenges such as prison overcrowding.

Planned measures include:

  • Texas-style earned release schemes: Allowing prisoners to reduce sentences through good behaviour and rehabilitation efforts.
  • Stronger community punishments: Expanding alternatives to custody for low-level offenders.
  • Capacity relief: Measures to ease the strain on prisons while maintaining public safety.

This combination reflects the government’s attempt to balance firmness with practicality.

What This Means for Judges

Importantly, the Ministry of Justice has stressed that individual sentencing decisions will remain the responsibility of judges.

Judges will continue to apply the law, consider mitigating and aggravating factors and tailor punishments to each case. The reforms target only the guidelines framework, not day-to-day judicial discretion.

However, the direction of sentencing policy may now shift depending on government priorities, potentially influencing how courts apply justice in practice.

Implications for Defendants

For defendants, the reforms may lead to:

  • Less leniency in certain cases if government vetoes block guidelines aimed at rehabilitation.
  • Greater uncertainty as sentencing frameworks become more politically influenced.
  • Potential for appeal arguments where defendants feel guidance was unfairly withheld.

This makes it even more important to seek advice from criminal defence solicitors who understand both current guidelines and the evolving political landscape.

How Newgate Solicitors Can Help

At Newgate Solicitors, we have extensive experience navigating complex sentencing frameworks. Our team understands the interaction between law, policy, politics and how this affects real people.

Whether you face a minor offence or a serious criminal charge, our solicitors provide tailored sentencing advice, challenge unfair treatment and ensure your rights are protected.

If you are concerned about how the Justice Secretary sentencing powers may impact your case, contact us today for confidential legal support.

Frequently Asked Question

What are the new Justice Secretary sentencing powers?

They allow the Justice Secretary to veto any new guidelines from the Sentencing Council.

Does this undermine judicial independence?

Judges still decide individual cases but sentencing policy is now subject to political approval.

Who else has veto powers?

The Lady Chief Justice also has independent veto authority.

What is the Sentencing Bill?

It is new legislation reforming sentencing oversight and introducing prison and community measures.

Why were minority offender reports blocked?

Critics argued they created unequal treatment, though data shows minority offenders often receive longer sentences.

When do the reforms take effect?

The Bill is currently being debated in Parliament and will apply once passed.

Will prison overcrowding be solved by these reforms?

The government hopes earned release and stronger community sentences will ease pressure.

Can defendants challenge unfair guidance blocks?

Challenges may be possible through appeals or judicial review, depending on circumstances.

Do sentencing guidelines still apply?

Yes, existing guidelines remain in force until new ones are approved.

How can solicitors help with sentencing?

Solicitors provide expert advice, represent clients in court and challenge unfair sentencing outcomes.

Know Someone Thats Been Affected

If you or someone you know is affected by sentencing policy changes or facing criminal proceedings, expert legal guidance is essential. At Newgate Solicitors, our team specialises in criminal defence and can help you navigate complex sentencing laws. Contact us today for professional advice.




By browsing this website, you agree to our privacy policy.
I Agree